Nearly all healing modalities, whether traditional or alternative/complimentary, are linear constructs. They occur in an environment of divorce, the land of the ego-mind, wherever there is a healer and a healee, a different entity which is “performing” the healing. There’s still another reality, the one which is non-linear, where there’s acceptance of the oneness of things, which sinks into the infinite power of formation itself. The problem is, how does one accessibility that other fact, even when one is not themselves, a totally self-realized being?
First we have to establish what a home understood being is. Self realization is just a state of consciousness wherever one is aware that at their primary, they are mind itself and that there surely is number separation between all things non duality teachers. It is just a reasonably sophisticated state, embodied by about 4/10 of just one % of the world’s citizenry, that will be usually indicated by unconditional love and a feeling of bliss.
This nevertheless, is only the entrance to even larger claims, that of the saints, the sages and the fully enlightened ones. For many people the improvement to the state of consciousness is unpredictable, characterized by periods of blissful mergence into nonlinear truth and a falling back into daily reality. This is especially true in the west, where we have no tradition of knowing or promoting, spiritual seekers.
Fundamentally we want to faucet in to that which includes the absolute most power, in order to help that that will be the toughest thing for people; change. You want to touch into mind itself, whether you call it “The Subject”, Lord, Nature, Divinity, etc. The software that’s offered the most wonders around the history of humanity is surrender; submit in the proper execution of prayer and surrender in the shape of letting move of the ego-mind’s agenda; thinking this one is actually doing something.
In his seminal work on the subject, “Power vs. Force” and the subsequent, “Truth vs. Falsehood”, David Hawkins presented a logarithmic range, where he adjusted quantities of consciousness and their characteristics, which coincidentally suggested the relative energy available. As the behave of accomplishing, is as strong as one’s possess degree of consciousness, the behave of submit to The Field/God/Divinity calibrates at the entry amount of enlightenment, and possibly to an even understood by only some handfuls of experts on the span of recorded history. If one takes into consideration the recent function of physicist, Efthimios Harokopos, that “there is more possible power in a single cubic centimeter of empty place than in all the bulk of the identified universe”; you can look the possible accessible to/through consciousness.
Therefore does which means that that it’s a spend of time and energy to examine the teachings of others and understand new things? Generally not very, though it is beneficial to be discriminating, about what one is studying and the relative truth of the teachings. I have found that by learning the performs which adjust relatively large and then testing as to what is debateable, one is way better able to know and interpret the information which can be obtained through the field.
It is through the assimilation of integrous product and arriving at an knowledge of the correlations of numerous, and occasionally relatively diverse teachings, that one has the capacity to change and apply that which will be exposed through higher consciousness. In addition it provides me a concept about what questions to ask. It provides no function to deliver a message in which one has projected some spiritual illusion as a reason of an user-friendly glimpse. It is only through questioning the validity of what one is facilitating, whether it be energy, information or both, and their applicability to the situation, that one may really be a vehicle of healing.